Nov. 19-30 ,2012

Agenda 21: How the Utopian socialist masterminds at the UN will take over your life

I have been asked to write up what I know about Agenda 21 so that everybody can become enlightened about what it is and what it means to us in the USA. So first, we need to study a little history about Agenda 21. It is not a new thing, it has been around for a while now. Agenda 21 is an all-encompassing program which came about as a result of the June 1992 Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. They are going to have another one this year known as Rio+20 to further tighten the screws on us and try to pass more resolutions to take away our liberty and private property rights.
The primary goals of Agenda 21 are environmental in nature but it's tentacles spread far and wide encompassing everything needed by the New World Order to establish a Utopian socialist world government controlled by the unelected UN bureaucrats. They will stick their noses into everything, everywhere. There are many treaties and laws that have sprung up from Agenda 21. Agenda 21 is not a treaty or set of laws in and of itself, but rather is an umbrella agreement signed by 179 countries to work toward the "sustainable" models described in it. Once you understand what Agenda 21 really is, you will be able to see it in just about everything. It shows itself in the UN small arms treaty, the so-called "rights of the child" treaty, and it may even be found in your city's local zoning laws, depending on where you live.
The Georgia Guidestones
Out in the middle of a field near Elberton, GA, not far from where I live, a mysterious granite monument appeared out of nowhere with a list of guidelines on it that some mysterious man believed we should live by. Some believe it was Ted Turner who had it built. That isn't the important thing about it. What is the most important part, and what ties it to Agenda 21, is the population controls.

Agenda 21: Part II, How "sustainability" is sneaking into everything

I left off in part I with some links to things about population control so I will pick it back up there. The Utopian masterminds think that the earth will only "sustain" about 500 million people. The current world population being around 10 times that, this means that a lot of people will have to go. The US has over 300 million by itself. The plan is that we will die off over a period of time and the masterminds won't let succeeding generations reproduce at current levels. They want us to herd into "sustainable cities" where we will live in small apartments and ride public transportation. Cars are evil pollution generators, especially YOUR car. Remember Obama telling the guy at one of his town hall meetings that he needed to get rid of his SUV and get a hybrid? Agenda 21. The ideas of "sustainable development" get into government control of every aspect of your life: where you live and work, whether or not you will be allowed to own a car and if you do own one, how much you will be allowed to drive it without paying a penalty for it. Smart thermostats and appliances, controlled by the government over the smart electrical grid so they can keep you from wasting water and electricity are just a couple examples of this. These are Utopian masterminds hard at work controlling you and me in almost every part of our lives. They know they can't just come in and make these changes all at once so they do it a little at a time like boiling a frog. Put a frog in a pot of boiling water and he will jump out, but put him in cold water and turn the heat up slowly and he will boil before he even realizes it. Here are some links to check out on "sustainability" that will curl your hair:
These are the UN's own websites, I am showing you this IN THEIR OWN WORDS. This is not conspiracy theory, but conspiracy FACT. Recently you have probably seen articles about this but may have not realized that it was Agenda 21 in action. The town of Tombstone, AZ was recently blocked by the US Forest Service from accessing their own water supply to do repair work on it. Agenda 21. You may have read the recent posts here and on other sites about the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST), UN small arms treaty, the recent one about Canada getting "written up" for people not having access to food, and many others. Agenda 21 is at the root of all of this. I suggest that you all should find out if your town is involved in ICLEI and if they are do all you can to get them out of it.
In summary, I would like to recommend two books I have read recently: Mark Levin's Ameritopia and Dick Morris' new book "Screwed" which just came out. We may not be able to escape Ameritopia. I


The Czar in Hiding?                         11-19-2012

             Well, our board meeting was cancelled at the last minute tonight. TENTATIVELY re-scheduled for Saturday at 9.a.m, but should that change, I will post it immediately. I received numerous phone calls to advise me of the postponement, and the reason for it . The concensus is that the Czar requested the delay, as he did not have his necessary paperwork "in order".  Translation: He is buying time to build his excuses for his latest mis-deeds. Of course I am also sure he HATES the fact that this meeting was requested by two Councilmen  and not himself.  After all, HE is the Great Leader and the Council are mere footmen.

               Personally, I am a tad disappointed that there was no meeting, I was looking forward to seeing the Czar be chastised by the board. Oh well, it will come.  In the meantime, does everyone know that the property reassessments have begun? Yup. If you see two nice ladies come to your home, don't be alarmed or intimidated, they are VERY nice people just doing their jobs. In fact, I like these ladies enough, that I will NOT greet them at the door with a shotgun or set the German Shepherds on them!

             Now, something POSITIVE !  Y'all know how much I have been wanting to draw our teens and seniors together? This dream is about to come true! Brenda Ellman, the lady who has the flooding problems on Schoolhouse Road, shares my dream, and together, we are making it a reality. The Episcopal Church is making their Youth House available to us for after school fellowship and activities for high schoolers. We are building our committee and meeting with people from the Diocese in the next two weeks.

            The plans and ideas are numerous, and best of all, will include any and all seniors who wish to take part. We will be looking for Seniors who can tutor, teach the kids to cook, keep a checkbook, knit, woodworking skills, or any other talent they wish to share. In return, the kids will provide basic lawn care, minor repairs, computer training, etc. to the Seniors. We will also be scheduling movie nights, fundraisers for Charlie's Pantry, and eventually such things as music lessons, book clubs, bake-offs, field trips, community service, Civics, animal care, and job counseling. One day, we hope to even consider some Adult Ed classes, Nutrition and Gardening Classes via Cooperative Extension, and evening Bible Studies geared for youth.

            It won't all happen overnight, but it WILL happen, and it's exciting. We need and welcome all parents, teachers, craftsmen, Clergy, and especially  seniors to join us in this effort to help the most important people in our town, our kids and our Senior Citizens!  I will keep you posted on our progress.

            It looks to be a pretty quiet week ahead, so unless something noteworthy comes up, I will probably not post each night.  I will be doing some more research into Agenda 21, and finishing up projects around the cabin while we have this awesome weather. I have a few good links for you tonight and a couple I will comment on, as I just can't help myself. LOL!


Tonight's Links!

White House Changed "Talking Points" on Benghazi. Ooh, BIG Shocker!


About Those Ohio Voting Machines

Guess Who Obama's First Post-Election Meeting was With?

Obama Says He Wishes He Could Impose His Will on Congress.

Chuck Norris SLAMS FEMA

Doctor HATES Obamacare

Obama Supporter Wakes from COMA!

Christmas Boycott Request

    Now, these next two links are the ones that have me ired.  Why is it, that every time a Liberal or a Democrat, (is that redundant?), gets criticized in ANY way for ANYTHING, it is Racism or Sexism?  Yet when it is the other way around, it is acceptable, Free Speech? The Dems have been calling names for YEARS with no reprisals or Temper-Tantrums from the Right. WE are called Homophobes, Racists, Sexists, Anti-Semites, Crackers, Extremists, Clingers, etc.,etc. Susan Rice is not eligible for the position of Secretary of State NOT because she is female, or Black, or even because she is a Liberal Dem. She is not ELIGIBLE, because she appeared on FIVE T.V Talk shows in ONE day and LIED to the American people each and every time! WHEN will politicians get a clue that LYING is Naughty. It is in the 10 Commandments; "Thou Shalt not Bear False Witness".  Lying may not be a Felony, but it is an indication of character or the lack of.  Liars are not to be trusted, therefore, they do not belong in office at any level, period.

Dems Continue to Whine Over Susan Rice Issue


Democrat Congresswomen Cry ‘Racism’ and ‘Sexism’

For all their talk about equal rights, equal pay, job parity, and breaking through the glass ceiling, Democrats are the biggest hypocrites. Proof of this can be seen in the way they treat conservative women whether black or white and how they attack any criticism of other Democrat women.
They want to be paid like men but they are not willing to take criticism like men.
The latest hypocrisy coming from the feminist camp is the condemnation of the criticism of Susan Rice, the current Ambassador to the United Nations. Rice is the person who was sent out by the Obama administration to sell the idea that the Benghazi attack was a spontaneous uprising over some obscure anti-Mohammad video that probably only six people had seen. The video-tape cause narrative was a sham from the start. The question is, Did Ambassador Rice know it, and if she did, who told her to use it? Rice is not above criticism because she’s a woman. She’s playing with the big boys, so she needs to take it like the big boys do. If she can’t then she needs to find a different line of work.
In order to protect one of their own, to silence the opposition in an attempt to cover for Ms. Rice from scrutiny that might damage President Obama, Democrat women are attacking Republicans:
“The incoming chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus – Rep. Marcia Fudge, a Democrat from Cleveland – accused Sen. John McCain of ‘sexism and racism’ for criticizing UN Ambassador Susan Rice for going on five Sunday talk shows and claiming the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi was a spontaneous reaction to a video posted on YouTube.”
Fudge claimed that “sexism and racism” are the real reason Rice is being attacked. Not to be outdone, Rep. Gwen Moore, another Democrat, “said that McCain and other ‘men’ should not be allowed to ‘attack’ or ‘batter this woman’ Rice.” “Not allowed”? Does she want a law passed? The First Amendment was specifically designed to allow criticism of people in power without legal retaliation.
How many Democrats stood up for Clarence Thomas when he was attacked and battered? I don’t recall any. Where were these Democrat women when Condeleezza Rice and Sarah Palin were repeatedly savaged by their fellow-Democrats?
If Democrat women want equal rights, then they need to stand up and take it like men. It seems that being black and female only count on the upward swing. Once there, being a woman and of a particular race makes a Democrat immune from criticism.
Unfortunately for the Democrats, there’s a Republican senator who has joined with the sexist and racist men in wanting to learn the truth from Susan Rice — New Hampshire Senator Kelly Ayotte. Mary Chastain of Newsbusters comments:
“The media is determined to push the idea that the GOP is waging a war on women. If they included Senator Ayotte in their coverage of the pressure being applied to Ambassador Rice, it would blow their argument out of the water. Senators McCain and Graham can be used to further the media image of the GOP as old, white, out-of-touch males who don’t like women; Senator Ayotte does not.”
If a Democrat woman wants to be paid like a man, then she needs to walk like a man and take criticism like a man. If not, then she needs to go back to the kitchen and bake some cookies.

November 18, 2012

| ShareShare
November 18, 2012

Bias by the Numbers

Leo Rennert
Pick up the Sunday, Nov. 18 edition of the Washington Post and you'll find a lengthy, front-page wrap-up about Israel's antiterrorist counteroffensive in Gaza -- with three perfect examples of pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel bias. all within eight paragraphs of each other ("GAZA CLASH WIDENS -- Israel expands air assault against Hamas, says Tel Aviv-bound rocket was intercepted" by Karin Brulliard and Abigail Hauslohner).
Here they are by the numbers:
1) Brulliard and Hauslohner devote half a dozen paragraphs to a heart-tugging, up-close and personal account of two Gaza teachers awakened by the family's windows shattering and their walls bursting open. The house next door, which belonged to a Hamas commander, sustained a direct hit. One of the teachers "frantically dug his five children out of the rubble." The other teacher "rushed from room to room, crying and gathering her children's clothing, school bags and dolls." The Post quotes her as saying again and again, "Where are we going to go? The Israelis are responsible. They are the enemy of God. What did we do? Did we carry any missiles? Did we launch any rockets?" All very poignant. But what about similar scenes in Israel, where Hamas rockets by the hundreds have been pounding civilian targets from Ashkelon, Ashdod, and Netivot to the proximity of Tel Aviv and Jerusalem? Do Brulliard and Hauslohner devote as much space to cameos of Israelis, especially children, suffering from shock and post-traumatic stress? Does their suffering also rate half a dozen paragraphs of sympathetic coverage? If not six paragraphs, how about three... or maybe just one paragraph? Or a single despairing quote? But in the entire Post article, there isn't a single sentence depicting Israelis frantically rushing to shelters as sirens blare at any time of day -- or the traumas left in their wake. Nothing, nada. As Shakespeare might have protested: "If you prick us, do we not bleed?"
2. Brulliard and Hauslohner, writing about Israeli air strikes that demolished a Hamas police building and the headquarters of Hamas prime minister Ismail Haniyeh, conclude that "Israel appeared to be channeling new efforts toward Hamas civilian institutions." Hamas headquarters a "civilian institution"? It is nothing of the sort. The terrorist group has a unitary command-and-control apparatus and infrastructure. This is where all the terrorist plots are hatched under single command. But the Post, long known for its predilection to sanitize Hamas, presents them as "civilian" facilities that presumably should remain untouched. How touching -- for beleaguered Hamas, with Brulliard and Hauslohner to the rescue of this terrorist outfit.
3) And what about fatalities on either side? Here's the article's take: "The death toll in Gaza rose to 45 by Saturday evening, Health Ministry officials said. Three Israelis have been killed by rocket fire from Gaza." Forty-five dead "Palestinians" versus three dead "Israelis." The numerical comparison, however, is highly misleading. It's apples and oranges. On the Israel side, the three fatalities were civilians -- a reflection of Hamas aiming its massive rocket barrages at civilian populations. On the Gaza side, however, Israeli air strikes are carefully and deliberately aimed at terrorists, their arms caches, ammunition, and rocket launchers. Yes, there are collateral fatalities, but only because Hamas and other terror groups in Gaza hide amid civilians and use them as ''human shields.'' Estimates of combatant-versus-noncombatant fatalities in Gaza are beginning to trickle in. Early figures show most of them were combatants engaged in terrorist operations. To bundle civilian and terrorist fatalities into a single statistic leaves readers with a false impression that perhaps most or all of those killed Gazans were civilians -- the very opposite of what's really happening there. Bottom line: Washington Post readers beware. This isn't kosher journalism.
Leo Rennert is a former White House correspondent and Washington bureau chief of McClatchy Newspapers

Read more:


What if Obama had to interview for the job rather than Campaign?

Written on Monday, November 19, 2012 by David L. Goetsch
The process by which we choose our presidents in America is apparently broken, or if not broken it is at least suspect. Why, you ask, would I make such an assertion? Am I a political heretic? Am I questioning the concept of democracy? The answer to both of these questions is “no I am not.” Rather, I am questioning the practical application of the concept, specifically as it relates to how we choose our president. In the private sector, if the hiring process resulted in the selection of the least-qualified applicant we would know something is wrong since choosing the best-qualified applicant was the goal. If the goal of the process by which we select our president is to choose the best qualified candidate, our process is without question broken.
What if Barack Obama, instead of campaigning, had to interview for the job of president and provide a resume to the American people? His resume would have almost no entries before the one showing his first term as president, and that entry would contain nothing but a litany of failed policies and programs. Frankly, with a resume like his, Barack Obama could not even get a job in today’s economy. Even when hiring minimum-wage employees, companies do a better job of screening their applicants than America did in selecting our president in the recent election. If Barack Obama had to interview for the job of President of the United States, his interview might go something like this:
Interviewer: Mr. Obama, unemployment in our country is higher than it has been in years. We are looking for a leader who can turn our economy around and create jobs for Americans who are hurting. Do you have any experience in creating jobs?
Barack Obama: Yes, I have created jobs. I created jobs for 43 czars and 279 new presidential assistants in the White House. Does that count? I know what you are thinking: 43 and 279 does not quite offset the 1.6 million jobs I eliminated in the private sector, but it’s a start.
Interviewer: Hum, I see. Well, let’s move on to the price of gasoline. The price at the pump is giving most Americans sticker shock every time they fill up. Prices have fallen somewhat in the last several months, but not much and they are still very high. We are looking for a leader who can use the power of the presidency to help reduce gas prices. Do you have any experience in reducing the price of gasoline?
Barack Obama. No, I have done nothing to reduce the price of gas, but I have done plenty to increase it. In fact, when I took office gas averaged $1.89 per gallon nationally. It is now averaging around $3.40 per gallon. If I can keep this trend going in the right direction, Americans will begin to accept my ideas for alternative energy sources such as wind and solar. But between you and me, the price of gas is going to have to get much higher than $3.40 per gallon for that to happen. I need to get it up to $5.00 or more per gallon and keep it there consistently or my cronies in alternative energy businesses aren’t going to survive.
Interviewer. I see. Well, let’s talk about the national debt. We are concerned that it is robbing our children of their future. Consequently, we are looking for someone who can drastically reduce the national debt. Do you have any experience in this area?
Barack Obama. I’m glad you asked. The national debt is one of my areas of expertise. In fact, during less than four years as president I was able to increase the national debt by 51 percent. You look shocked. If you don’t believe me, check the numbers. I inherited a national debt of $10.6 trillion and in less than four years increased it to $16 trillion and counting. No one else you will interview can make that claim.
Interviewer. That’s, uh, very interesting. One last question Mr. Obama. We are concerned about the number of people living in poverty. Do you have any experience in moving people out of poverty and up the socio-economic ladder?
Barack Obama. No, can’t say that I have. As president my plan was to get as many people living in poverty and addicted to government entitlements as possible—it keeps them loyal don’t you see? The way I look at it poverty means dependency and I want people to depend on government. It makes them easier to manipulate.
Interviewer. Thank you Mr. Obama. That’s all of my questions. Don’t call us, we’ll call you—or, on second thought, maybe we won’t.

November 19, 2012

Two soldiers from Fort Riley's 1st Infantry Division have been killed while deployed to Paktika Province in Afghanistan.

The division issued a release Monday saying Sgt. Channing Hicks and Spc. Joseph Richardson were killed Friday when they were attacked by militants using roadside bombs and small-arms fire. Both men were assigned to 1st Battalion, 28th Infantry of the division's 4th Infantry Brigade Combat Team and were on their first deployment to Afghanistan.

The 24-year-old Hicks was from Greer, S.C., and joined the Army in June 2006. He had two previous deployments to Iraq.

Richardson, 23, was from Booneville, Ark., and joined his unit in October 2008. He had one previous deployment to Iraq with the 1st Infantry Division.

It's always with great sadness that we have to report about the deaths of our troops. But we can't ignore their sacrifices either, we have to recognize that these young men and women are so brave because they know they're volunteering for a dangerous job - defending our homeland and our way of life. So please remember to pray for our troops in harm's way this Thanksgiving, and give thanks to them for the sacrifices they are making on our behalf.

The Wimpy Church                      11-20-2012

        I thought I would have nothing to discuss for a day or two, but as usual, my head won't give me a day off.  As things continue to ramp-up in Israel , I find the media handling of the situation to be more and more offensive. Today, Turkey referred to Israel as a "Terrorist Country". No one in the Obama administration objected, instead they claimed that since both Turkey and Israel are our "Allies", they don't want to take sides. Excuse me?  Are not ALL the Middle-Eastern countries Muslim- controlled now with the exception of Israel?

         Hamas has been posting out-dated photos of injured and dead children and civilians and blaming Israel for deaths that were caused by Hamas' OWN missiles. Sympathy seems to be directed toward Gaza, the people who fired the first shot, the people who have no RIGHT to even BE on the Gaza strip, the Radical Islamic lunatics. I agree with Glenn Beck's stand on the issue, that Israel was backed into a corner by radicals and was left with no choice but to fight back.

         Beck asked if we in America, would do nothing if Canada starting firing missiles into Buffalo,N.Y, or Mexico into Texas.  THINK about that. Did you know that Israel is situated at the exact center of the earth, and that Jerusalem sits in the exact center of Israel? Tiny Israel is an oasis in a war-torn desert of violent, mentally-ill, hateful, despotic and blood-thirsty countries, yet she remains strong and proud. Israel has something the rest of the world does not. If you don't know what that something is, you might want to pick up a Bible and blow the dust off the cover.

          Evolutionists can give a million and one excuses and scientific explanations for their beliefs, yet they cannot explain the geographical position of Israel, or the fact that no country that has come against her has ever succeeded. None ever will. That does not mean however, that we should not stand behind Israel and defend her with our last breath if necessary. Which brings me to the real reason I am posting tonight. Wimpy Christianity.

           I'm not going to quote scripture here, partly because I like to nudge folks to look into the Word for themselves, and partly because I don't want to go looking for it myself right now either. I admit it, I am a tad lazy tonight, still trying to kick this cold or virus or whatever it is I've been fighting all month.  In any case, I have studied the Bible enough to know that Christians today are NOT doing their job.


The story that the link below will bring you to, explains EXACTLY how I have been feeling for the past year. These feelings of resentment toward Christian Churches and Clergy have escalated in the last few months of this year's campaign and of course immediately following the election itself. I am angry, disappointed, and embarassed by my fellow Christians who fail to Speak or Stand against the wrongs or to defend the Rights. God was not a Wimp and He never intended for his people to be either.                

The Bible is brimming with scripture that proves the Christian's DUTY to take an active role in the government that so influences our daily lives, our beliefs and our Faith. I am tired of Wimpy Christians, Wimpy Clergy, and of the excuses given by so many that mistakenly believe that Christianity means to be always humble, always still, silent, and meek. Turning the other cheek is fine in some situations, but once we have offered them both up to slaps, are we to lie down and wait to be kicked?

In the days since Obama won re-election, my husband and I have had several discussions about this subject. We do not agree. He feels that since God is in control, we are merely to pray and rely upon Him for relief and guidance. To a point, my husband is correct. However, I do not feel that prayer and Faith are ALL that is expected of us by God. I believe that the Christian is obligated to be active in the fight against sin, that we are to go out on that proverbial limb and put ourselves on the front line for Christ. For ME, it is HERE that Faith and Trust in God come into play. Taking action, risking it all, and bearing up under persecution, are the times when we need to step out on Faith and Trust God to protect us and strengthen us. It is when we put ourselves in harm's way for what the Bible tells us is Right, that we earn God's protection and approval.

Sitting in the pew on Sunday, praying beside your bed at night, are wonderful, necessary parts of Christian living, but they are not ENOUGH! Christians have POWER, they have GOD! Failing to unite and to stand for all He has taught us is not an option for ME. Throwing away the wisdom and Grace He has given to us by sitting idly by while the United States implodes, while Israel is attacked, is not acceptable. Clergy standing upon the pulpits and saying NOTHING, is unacceptable. I have not been to church since the election, I cannot bring myself to look upon professed Christians who believe that our political situation is off-limits, that are intimidated by the I.R.S and the threat of losing their Tax Exemptions! Are not the Truth and Obedience to God far more important than a tax-free church building

           My friend Pastor Jack, is also upset by the lack of Christian voices and actions. I sent him the above link today, and he responded:

I was asked by a FaceBook friend this question: WHAT IS YOUR TAKE ON THE ELECTION? Here is the answer I gave:

Well the people of America have spoken and I was so surprised by what they've chosen. Choices have consequences and I believe that no matter what the GOP spin doctors say, this is not about marketing, it is about the heart of America. Over half of the nation voted against the Lord and for the shedding of innocent blood and the degradation of Marriage; not to mention our stand for Israel. We can only expect the chastising of the Lord as a nation in the next 4 years. "If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?" (Psalm 11:3). It is now time to bring the knowledge of Jesus Christ forward into our culture without fear or intimidation. First, however, large numbers of Christians need to repent for voting for this President's ungodly policies. Christians voted for him and thus chose legalized perversion and the position for the legal killing of babies in the womb. This is not about politics, it is about making a choice and the Lord knows. My take is that pastors / preachers need to call the church to repentance right now and then call the church to bring the knowledge of Christ out of the 4 walls of the church buildings into the culture. Let Jesus be now "in the face" of the society. It will lead to persecution, but also to many conversions. THAT IS MY TAKE ON IT. Thanks for asking.

The above is on facebook today. also I posted the link below.
Rev. Jack Fucci, Jr.

Rev. Jack Fucci, Jr., Ph.D.
Foundation Ministries

               Jack never hesitates to say what he feels, IRS or no IRS. It's one of the many things I love about him, and it is to him that I often turn for spiritual advice.  Though I try not to proselytize on this website too often, there are times that it is necessary, and the path America is taking and the issues in the Holy Land , tell me that this is one of those times. I have known Christians who were so passionate about NOT mixing religion and politics, that they literally exploded if the subject was broached. I have also known many that believe as I do, that we should be more pro-active.
          I am posting a piece about our churches and clergy of the past, and how THEY approached the issue. I welcome the opinions of other Christians as well. How do YOU feel?  Send comments to: PACTJJ@GMAIL.COM.

Church Failure Led to Obama Re-Election

In colonial America, virtually all news was disseminated from the pulpits of churches throughout the colonies. Besides being a place to worship God, churches were the only real town meeting center and it was the role of the pastor to keep his flock informed.
When it came time to rebel against the British, the announcements were made from the pulpits. The call to arms was not only considered to be a civic duty but a religious one as well. Many a pastor also picked up his rifle and went to fight for America’s freedom.
As America grew, the role of the church continued to be that of religion and news. Pastors felt it was their duty as servants of God to inform their congregations about important events and about the various candidates running for office. In those days, pastors were free to endorse political parties and candidates and keep their people well informed.
Now that most churches are tax exempt, they feel that they are not allowed to say anything political whatsoever. The bullying effect of the federal government has all but silenced the church’s involvement in political affairs. However, pastors and church leaders can still keep their people informed of political issues, political ideologies, and to encourage them to vote based on their faith in biblical principles.
Three hundred years ago virtually all political news was disseminated from the pulpit. Today, almost no political news comes from the pulpit. In the 2004 presidential election 27% of voters who attend church regularly said that they received information on political parties or candidates from their place of worship. This past November only 13% said they received information on political parties or candidates from their place of worship.
The rise of liberal progressivism virtually mirrors the declining political role of churches and church leaders. It just may be that the Church’s silence on political issues and candidates is what gave the election of Barack Obama. Had pastors been doing their job, as in days of old, America may have had whole different look to it today.
Rather than blame the GOP loss on Mitt Romney’s campaign, GOP moderatism, modes of campaign advertising, or any other thing that people have been blaming the GOP loss on, I believe it is a direct result of the Church’s failure to inform their people properly. And until the church realizes that it has a civic as well as religious duty we may never get America back. So when you look for someone or something to blame, look at your own church and pastor and ask yourself if they did their job in informing you of which political issues and candidates were closer to biblical principles. If the answer is no, now you know why Barack Obama won a second term.


When America Comes Knocking

AP Reporter Slams Administration for Failing to Stand for Israel

The Roots of Political Correctness
George Orwell's 1984


Good for YOU, Marco!

Media freak out over Rubio’s remarks on age of the Earth

6:32 PM 11/19/2012
Alex Pappas
Political Reporter

The media are in full freak-out mode over Florida Sen. Marco Rubio’s comments about the age of the Earth.
“I got a chill when I read Rubio’s statements,” Phil Plait, an astronomy blogger, wrote in a story at Slate.
It all started when GQ magazine published an interview with the Republican senator on Monday that included the question, “How old do you think the Earth is?”

Scientists estimate that the Earth is 4.5 billion years old, though Christians cite the Bible in saying the Earth is younger. It’s the sort of question meant to give insight into whether someone believes in evolution or creationism — or both.
“I’m not a scientist, man,” Rubio responded to the question from the GQ reporter, going on to explain that the question is “one of the great mysteries.”
“I think the age of the universe has zero to do with how our economy is going to grow,” Rubio said. “I’m not a scientist. I don’t think I’m qualified to answer a question like that.”
News outlets – ranging from the Washington Post to Politico – drew attention to the remarks. Liberals and left-leaning outlets subsequently mocked Rubio for it.
“As I like to say, the GOP doesn’t just want to roll back the New Deal; it wants to roll back the Enlightenment,” the liberal New York Times columnist Paul Krugman wrote.

“Scientists agree: the Earth is about 4.5 billion years old. But don’t tell that to Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) — he thinks the age of the Earth can be discovered by studying the Bible,” a blogger at the left-wing ThinkProgress wrote.
Conservatives, other the other hand, dismissed the inquiry as a “gotcha question” and the subsequent response as manufactured outrage designed to make Rubio, viewed as a future star of the Republican Party, look bad.
Rubio aides, however, don’t seem to be sweating it.
“We thought it was a good interview, so it’s great people are talking about it and (hopefully) linking to it,” spokesman Alex Conant told The Daily Caller.

    SEE? OUR beliefs are "mocked". Well guess what? Carbon dating set the age of a 1-year-old turtle at 127 million years old! About as accurate as police radar guns!

Hamas Rockets Kill Child – Hamas Blames Israel – World Believes Hamas

I heard in on the local and national news that Israeli airstrikes killed children in Gaza. Most of the mainstream media was instantly blaming Israel for the needless killing of children and some went so far as to blame the current exchange of fire on Israel.
Two news reports I saw failed to mention that Hamas started the current conflict by launching hundreds of rockets into Israel from the Gaza. Israel, of course retaliated with numerous airstrikes and rockets launched back at Gaza targets. Israel claims that most all of their targets were aimed at Hamas militants and locations were rockets were being launched from.
Shortly after things escalated Hamas leaders were seen parading the body of a dead child through the streets. At the time Egyptian Prime Minister Hisham Kandil was visiting Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh. One of the photographs seen around the world was taken when the Egyptian Prime Minister kissed the dead child.
But it didn’t take long for others to realize that Israeli airstrikes had not occurred at the time of the Egyptian Prime Minister’s visit. Coupled with a long history of Hamas faking civilian deaths in Gaza, many believe that the child was killed by Hamas’s own rockets and not by an Israeli airstrike. A week ago discovered Hamas using a month old photo taken in Syria and claimed they were recent civilian casualties due to Israeli strikes.
There are of course civilian deaths that occur in Gaza but so far most of them have been attributed to Hamas and not Israel. So please remember when watching or listening to our liberal mainstream media that they are quick to put the blame on Israel and that Hamas has a long history of lying and faking civilian deaths. You can’t always believe everything you see and hear especially from the media that are experts at twisting and hiding the truth in so many areas.

The PIG of Prevarication

Obama in Burma, Appeasing Another Dictatorship

Burma is a society under tyranny. The military government has a record of human rights violations such as genocide, systematic rape, slavery, sex trafficking and child labor.
The government is so reprehensible, in fact, that many civilized countries refuse to acknowledge the name Myanmar, which is the official name of the country since the military junta changed it in 1989.
As such, you would expect the country to receive some stern words from the president of the freest country on Earth, something along similar lines to “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!” perhaps.
Instead, President Obama, fresh off his re-election, was out kissing up to another dictatorship today when he spoke in Burma. In his honor, the Burmese government release several dozen prisoners.
It wasn’t exactly an apology tour this time, but he pointedly referred to the country as Myanmar, throwing a bone to the country’s dictatorship, when U.S. policy for years has been to call it Burma.
During his speech, Obama assured his audience that “the United States of America is with you.”
He also threw in some of his usual socialist happy talk about how important it is for people to be allowed to own the land they live on, unless they become too wealthy, in which case their wealth needs to be redistributed.
Obama was there to pump up trade relations and congratulate Burma on its “transition” to a more mercantile society, nothing more. There was some pap about empowering young people, “investing in you” and so on in a country where people are still held as political prisoners for speaking up and where brutal treatment of anyone who steps out of line is still the order of the day.
But the most tooth-gnashing part of the speech was hearing the supposed leader of the free world tell an audience under dictatorship, “Now, on other hand, as president, I cannot just impose my will on Congress — the Congress of the United States — even though sometimes I wish I could.”
Why not just say, “Gee, you guys are really on to something with this tyranny thing”?
The joke, of course, is that Obama has imposed his will on Congress more than once, during the whole Obamacare “debate” and most notably when he wrote, passed and authorized amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants through executive order.
Once again, America’s principles are undercut by the man in the Oval Office.

The Communist Takeover Of
America - 45 Declared Goals

From Greg Swank

You are about to read a list of 45 goals that found their way down the halls of our great Capitol back in 1963. As you read this, 39 years later, you should be shocked by the events that have played themselves out. 

Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963


Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.

At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which she identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen:

[From "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen]

1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.

43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.

Giving Thanks                                                11-22-2012

              Happy Thanksgiving. Hope y'all had a great meal and good company. We had a A+ day here at the cabin with family and friends. Have you ever wondered why people become Human again on the holidays ? There's something about Thanksgiving and Christmas that brings out the best in people. We are gentler, friendlier, more charitable, and just plain BETTER than we are the rest of the year. Well, with the exception of the crazies that go out on Black Friday and trample each other to death over a wide-screen T.V, but that's another story.

               The holidays just seem to have a magic air about them that transforms even the most miserable among us into warm,forgiving and and likeable folks. I think this transformation, short-lived as it always is, is my favorite part of the celebrations. In general, I am no fan of ANY holidays.  As a person that thrives on routine, even weekends can throw me off, so you can imagine how much the holidays cramp my style. Of course, once you stop believing in Santa Claus, it's never the same anyway! LOL!

                 As a Christian, I respect Christmas for what it symbolizes, but it IS just a symbol. No one really knows exactly when Jesus was actually born, so December 25th is just the day we have chosen to honor and celebrate that gift. When and how, it became a commercial holiday, I don't know. The spirituality of the day has been stolen by the mad rush to buy the best gifts and spend the most money on toys and baubles that mean nothing. As I was thinking about this today, a question came to mind that I really would love an answer to.

                  Why IS it, that the Liberals, Progressives, Atheists, etc., celebrate Easter, Thanksgiving and Christmas, all of which are CHRISTIAN holidays? They persecute us, blaspheme God and ignore His Word, they sin deliberately and repeatedly, they lie consistently, stores instruct their employees to say, "Happy Holidays" to customers rather than "Merry Christmas". Yet the Liberals and Atheists are out there filling their shopping carts with Easter candy, Butterball turkeys, and Christmas gifts, decorations and wrappings! The stores that refuse to verbally recognize the "Christ" in Christmas, rake in MILLIONS of dollars. So why IS THAT? Isn't that hypocritical?

                Shouldn't these non-believers be the ones that WORK on these holidays so that the Christians can stay home and enjoy THEIR celebrations with family? Why do these people object to a manger scene on the public square, but stay up on Christmas eve to fill their children's stockings? Is it the Double-Standard again, or just mere stupidity? I don't celebrate Ramadan, or Hannukah, I am not a Jew or an Arab. I do not believe in Allah or Mohammed. I never took the day off or bought gifts on those days.  To ME, it would seem that the God haters and deniers, should not celebrate the Christian Holidays. Stores that ban the word "Christmas", should not sell holiday items. (By the way, I have a list of stores that do and do not say the dreaded word, posted below).

               Thanksgiving too, is a Christian Holiday, a day to give thanks to, Guess Who? GOD. Can't deny the facts,folks.  That's the thing about Liberals, they just don't get it, AND they want to have their cake and eat it too. That's their philosophy about everything in life. ME, ME, ME. I want what I want and if it hurts YOU, tough. Stupid, Selfish, Spoiled, Dependent Babies.  My own parents were atheists, yet they spent a small fortune on these holidays. What gave them that right?  What gives ANY non-Believer that right?


Tonight's Links:

Stores that say "Merry Christmas" and Stores that Don't.

Obama is Santa-He is RED and GREEN!

WOW! TWO News Anchors Quit for Being Forced to Report Slanted News!

Dying Soldier Sings with His Son

AMERICA; The New Banana Republic


Seven Myths of the Radical Left About Thanksgiving

Thanksgiving Day should stand out in our hearts as one of the most sacred and significant days of celebration of the year. The importance of Thanksgiving Day does not merely stem from its patriotic value as the oldest national celebration in American history. The day should not be observed simply to maintain a historical tradition that was cherished long before it was officially declared a national holiday. Thanksgiving Day is momentous because it not only calls our remembrance to the awe-inspiring work of God’s providence among our forbearers, but also allows us to connect with them in a real way by demanding a perpetual reflection on the providence of God in our own lives. Whether joyfully or with more than a little misgiving, on Thanksgiving Day the nation acknowledges that we are the heirs of our Pilgrim Fathers. Thanksgiving provides a national identification that should connect with every American on a deep and intimate level. It is a day that points to the firm conviction that every good and perfect gift comes from above, and that we are the residual beneficiaries of God’s favor bestowed upon, and celebrated by our ancestors, during that first Thanksgiving feast. As we gather around our family tables in celebration of God’s providence and provision we are the fulfillment of the hope of those godly men and women; we are the enduring testimony to the fruition of their multi-generational vision of faithfulness.
At the same time, it is perhaps for this very reason that the hallowed importance of Thanksgiving Day is diminished in our modern culture. The necessary reflection on God’s providence invoked on this day is something that the unregenerate heart simply cannot grasp, much less celebrate. The essential theme of man’s utter dependence on God is something to which men shaped by the egotistical philosophy of the enlightenment cannot relate. The exclusive adoration and deep fidelity to Jesus Christ practiced among the Pilgrim Fathers is something that this secular generation finds intolerable. For this reason, each year the observance of Thanksgiving Day has gradually diminished into a day celebrated by an excess of parades, food, and football. Thanksgiving Day has been even further eroded by the radical left who, out of their hatred for God, has revised history to distort and pervert America’s Christian heritage. While the Christmas holiday has inherited its fictitious flying reindeer and Easter has inherited a fictitious egg laying rabbit, it seems that Thanksgiving has inherited a fictitious historical narrative, equal to those other absurdities, and accompanied by a barrage of unwarranted ridicule and speculative doubt.
For this reason, there are many who view Thanksgiving Day as a national day of mourning. While Thanksgiving Day is a happy time, many cannot celebrate the occasion without a small feeling of shame for the oppressors and remorse for the oppressed. Of course, such an understanding of history is based on a fictitious and speculative view of Pilgrim/ Indian relations. It is incumbent on Christian families of this generation to debunk the myths invented by those who seek to divorce history from truth because they have rejected God, the sovereign author of history. By debunking these myths we hope to reflect on the true meaning of this day of thanksgiving and restore a culture that gives proper glory, honor, and thanksgiving to God. We confront these unhappy skeptics to defend the honor and preserve the legacies of the Englishmen and Native Americans that gathered in friendship during that first thanksgiving harvest. The myth-making ability of modern skeptics seems to be limitless, but here let us contend with those myths that have been the most widely propagated and generally believed concerning our Pilgrim Fathers and their Native American friends.

Yes Virginia, There’s a Santa Claus, But He’s Not Karl Marx Or Barack Obama

santa-marx Is Karl Marx the dark version of Santa Claus? “From each according to his ability. To each according to his need.”
Since Rush Limbaugh has been talking about Obama as Santa Claus, I started thinking about Karl Marx as the Jolly Old Elf. Obviously, Karl Marx can’t be Santa Claus because Karl Marx is a thief. Santa is not a thief. But the handout from an anonymous stranger idea is similar. I think Rush is onto the “fundamental transformation” of Santa Claus.
Is Barack Obama the reincarnation of Karl Marx? If he is, he is a hybrid version of an opportunistic fascism and communism. Interesting, but lethal. Santa is not lethal. But Karl Marx is. When I think back to Barack Obama’s famous line about “Fundamentally transforming the United States of America,” I remember the dread and chill down my spine at the time. (unlike the thrill that went up Chris Matthews leg…mine was more like a ghost walked over my grave.)
Obama’s “fundamental transformation” means there is no longer a United States of America. And now Obama has become Santa Claus.
I finally watched a video that has been out for a while called, “Dreams From My Real Father.” I hadn’t sought it out, but someone loaned it to me to watch. I had thought it was probably just a stab in the dark, some remote concept that “might” have some few facts in it. I was wrong. It is extremely plausible. More than that. I believe it is true. After watching it, I believe the author is right on target. Barack Obama is a red diaper grand-baby and was groomed from the very beginning to implement Communism with every lying fiber of his being. His childhood story is not necessarily leading up to what you would guess would happen, winning the Presidency of the United States. But it did.
There is a very brief scene in the movie where Obama is walking on the sidewalk in DC, apparently right around the Capitol area. He is walking next to a much shorter man in a suit who is smiling and looking up at him. The shorter man seems very pleased to be conversing and walking with Obama, smiling and looking quite cheerful. That shorter man is my Republican congressman. That brief moment in the film sent chills down my spine….again. That congressman went to school with my children. I’ve known him a long time. The scene of him smiling and seeming to be so happy to be in Obama’s company was disappointing, to say the least. I instantly felt terrible for him, but worse for our nation.
By the end of the movie I found myself almost in tears. I had known a lot of the facts presented already, but to see them sewn together in that cohesive manner was a bit overwhelming. (If you can take it, I highly recommend watching and owning this video / movie. Your children will one day want to have this history lesson…God willing.)
Back to the red diaper baby theme, Karl Marx’s followers have been taught how to psychologically manipulate the masses. The Saul Alinsky method of collapsing the system has been common education to Ivy League law students and political students for decades. Hillary wrote her thesis on Alinsky and is in the Cloward and Piven camp to this day. Not satisfied with wrecking America, Obama and Hillary are busy crashing nations. Both were recently in Myranmar promising to hand out goodies to those Asians who will tow their line. I’m sure that will end well. (ahem.) Santa and Mrs. Claus / Marx. Lord only knows what they have stolen from us to give to the Muslim Brotherhood. We know what they have stolen from us to give to the UN and to their cronies in global businesses. We know what they have stolen from us to give to the welfare state and wreck the healthcare system here. We know they are stealing away our America.
As the Marxists in America are now driving the public school system, the Christian Holidays are becoming taboo, but the Federal government is promoted as Santa Claus. (I’ve noticed lately that Thanksgiving is being turned into “Harvest Day” so children don’t feel obligated to thank God for their blessings.) So here come the Holidays…but not the ones you think. The Holidays are being “fundamentally transformed” along with everything else.
Barack Obama, the Marxist, pretends to be Santa Claus to win elections. Jingles are written about him. Parades and celebrations created for him. His elves (read Czars) have in past years decorated the White House trees with Mao ornaments.
Karl Marx, aka Barack Obama pretending to be Santa Claus, is in the White House wearing a red diaper? Looks like it to me.
Happy Holidays…Here Comes Santa Claus!


-->From a teacher in the Nashville area - -

"We are worried about 'the cow' when it is all about the 'Ice Cream. 'The most eye-opening civics lesson I ever had was while teaching 3rd grade. The last Presidential election was heating up and some of the children showed an interest. I decided we would have an election for a class president. We would choose our nominees. They would make a campaign speech and the class would vote. To simplify the process, candidates were nominated by other class members. We discussed what kinds of characteristics these students should have. We got many nominations and from those, Jamie and Olivia were picked to run for the top spot.
The class had done a great job in their selections. Both candidates were good kids.

I thought Jamie might have an advantage because he got lots of parental support.

I had never seen Olivia's mother.

The day arrived when they were to make their speeches.

Jamie went first.

He had specific ideas about how to make our class a better place.
He ended by promising to do his very best.

Everyone applauded and he sat down.

Now is was Olivia's turn to speak.

Her speech was concise. She said, "If you will vote for me, I will give you ice cream." She sat down.

The class went wild. "Yes! Yes! We want ice cream."

She surely would say more. She did not have to.

A discussion followed. How did she plan to pay for the ice cream? She wasn't sure. But no one pursued that question. They took her at her word.

Would her parents buy it or would the class pay for it...She didn't know.

The class really didn't care. All they were thinking about was ice cream...

Jamie was forgotten. Olivia won by a landslide.

Every time Barack Obama opened his mouth he offered ice cream and 51.4 % of the people reacted like nine year old's.

They want ice cream.

The other 48.6% percent know they're going to have to feed the cow and clean up the mess."

This is the ice cream Obama promised us!

Remember, the government cannot give anything to anyone that they have not first taken away from someone else.
Did you vote for the ice cream?



Special Meeting Re-Scheduled                11-23-2012

             The meeting we were to have on Monday is scheduled for tomorrow, 11-24-2012 at 10 a.m at the American Legion Building. I'm sure the Czar has had adequate time to get his "Ducks in a Row", so to speak. We shall see, I guess. I still can't help but wonder about this meeting being held on a Saturday morning.  Seems like an effective method of keeping the attendance down. Gee, will the Tabloid writer, Gail Heinsohn make it that early? We can only hope NOT.

              The first link I've posted below is one I consider to be very important. When you listen to and watch this Congressman speak, please take note of first, his outrage, and second, his emotions. This is a man who takes the Benghazi incident personally, as do many Americans. An attack upon fellow Americans by Terrorists, especially an attack upon our Ambassador and SOLDIERS, is an attack on us ALL. Sadly, this too, has become an issue of division between the political parties, the Left and the Right. It should NOT be.

             The timing of the attack was a big problem for Obama, since election day was so close. The Democrats did what they always do; they covered it up, lied and made excuses to delay "dealing" with the matter until AFTER the election. That was THEIR decision, not the Republican's. Well, the election is over, and now it is time to face the issue head-on. Now the Democrats are whining that the insistence of the Right and the people, to investigate this attack, is sour grapes; revenge for losing the election. Their bag of excuses has no bottom.

              Had a REPUBLICAN been in the Oval Office when this attack occurred, the Left would have been screaming for blood, public hangings and at the very LEAST, Impeachment. Ah, but the tables are turned, this happened under Obama's watch. Obama may be Messiah to the poor, misled few, but he is not above the law. He will be held responsible for his actions or in-actions, exactly as a Republican President would have been.

              The Benghazi investigation is not a partisan issue, it is not a matter of payback. It IS an AMERICAN Tragedy that no one has answered for.  Did you KNOW, that before Ambassador Stevens was killed, that he was tortured and SODOMIZED? Fact. After MONTHS of pleading for more security, after NINE HOURS of bloody battle during which these men BEGGED for help, no one responded. These men were left alone to die. WHY?  Why were the trained troops that were ready and EAGER to go to their aid, told to "Stand Down"?  Was the Obama administration deliberately delaying in order to be certain that Stevens was dead? Did Stevens have information that was detrimental to Obama and the election?

                 Where does the cover-up begin and end? Who, other than Obama, was complicit, and why did they send Susan Rice out to lie, over and over and over, when she and they all knew damn well what the truth was?  Finally, WHY are Harry Reid and the Democrats in Congress, scrambling to squash this investigation? I gotta tell ya people, if we do NOT speak out and demand the truth, this WILL be swept under the rug. We CANNOT allow that to happen. This is not about Party lines, this is about four dead Americans, one of which was raped and tortured.

                If this event is allowed to simply go away, if those involved get away with this, then America truly IS lost, and it IS too late to heal her. If we the People, do not take a stand, how will we ever face our maker? Have we become SO amoral, SO unplugged and apathetic, that we would let those responsible go unpunished?  How do you think the families of those lost in this attack, will look at the rest of us if we do nothing? How will we look at ourselves

                 Please, please, PLEASE, call or write your Senators and Chris Gibson and tell them that you want to see this investigated in the same manner that Watergate was investigated, and those responsible, fired and charged with these murders. It is well past time for all politicians of EVERY party , get the message that they are subject to the Law in the same way as the rest of us are. Time to say, ENOUGH.  It's up to ME and it is up to YOU. Dare to make a difference.


Contact Information

Albany Office
State Street Room 504 - Capitol
Albany, NY 12247
United States
Phone: 518-455-2411
District Office
3 Neptune Road Suite A19B
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
United States
Phone: 845-463-0840
District Office
389 Fairview Avenue
Hudson, NY 12534
United States
Phone: 518- 828-1529

Chuck Schumer
Senator Schumer’s office receives tens of thousands of E-mails, phone calls, faxes and letters every week from concerned citizens like yourself. Because of the lengthy screening process for mail delivery, the best way to contact Senator Schumer or my Washington, DC staff remains either by phone at (202) 224-6542

Kirsten Gillibrand

New York City Office
780 Third Avenue
Suite 2601
New York, New York 10017
Tel. (212) 688-6262
Fax (866) 824-6340

Chris Gibson
Washington, DC Office 502 Cannon HOB Washington, D.C. 20515 T (202) 225-5614 F (202) 225-1168
Glens Falls Office 136 Glen St. Glens Fall, NY 12801 T (518) 743-0964 F (518) 743-1391
Kinderhook Office 2 Hudson St., PO Box 775 Kinderhook, NY 12106 T (518) 610-8133

Tonight's Links:

Vital Video
Remember Paul Harvey? HE saw this Coming!

Another Step Toward Communism